Skip to content
Back to Analysis
Core Outcome Sets (COS) logo

Core Outcome Sets (COS)

Learn more →

Description

COMET is working on creating standard outcomes for each specific disease called core outcome sets (COS). This is achieved through consensus among relevant stakeholders, including patients and healthcare professionals, who agree on the minimum set of standard outcomes for a particular disease.

Market positioning

Leading initiative in clinical trial outcome standardization

Target audience

Researchers, healthcare professionals, patients, and stakeholders involved in clinical trials and systematic reviews

Use cases

Standardizing clinical trial outcomes through consensus-based core outcome sets for specific diseases to improve research quality and comparability

Company information

Company size

Non-profit research consortium

Revenue

Grant-funded initiative

Scale

Global healthcare research initiative

Number of users

Global research community

Features

Consensus-based approach involving stakeholders, Disease-specific outcome standardization, Facilitates systematic review automation, Minimum set of standard outcomes, Standardized outcome sets for specific diseases

Pricing

Pricing modelfreemium
Starting priceFree access to core resources
Billing periodN/A - Research initiative

Rating

Highly regarded in academic circles

Pros and cons

Based on: (AI summary)

Pros

  • Consensus-based approach ensures stakeholder buy-in
  • Standardizes outcomes across clinical trials
  • Improves quality of systematic reviews
  • Facilitates automation of research synthesis
  • Involves patients and healthcare professionals

Cons

  • Time-consuming consensus process
  • Limited coverage of all diseases
  • Requires widespread adoption to be effective
  • May not capture all relevant outcomes for specific studies

Feature Comparison

Top features across 19 competitors (most common first)

Feature Cochrane Da…DistillerSRCore Outcom…CovidenceEPPI-Review…EPPI-Review…Nested Know…Internation…DynaMedJBI-SUMARIAbstrackrGiotto Comp…ACP Journal…LitStreamRobotReview…SWIFT-Activ…SRDB.PROEvidence-Ba…Journal Wat…
Reference management
Manual addition
Data extraction
Data extraction tools
Direct search capability
Living/updatable reviews
Machine learning integration
Collaboration tools
Dual extraction
Public outputs
Quality appraisal features
Screening automation
Data extraction capabilities
Collaboration features
Quality appraisal
Screening tools
Primary care journal review service
Literature screening
Clinical decision support
Cochrane Handbook for systematic review methods