Skip to content
LiverMultiScan logo

LiverMultiScan


Description

A noninvasive MRI scan that accurately assesses signs of liver disease, offering a complete picture of liver health through quantitative multiparametric MRI technology

Market positioning

Leading noninvasive liver assessment technology, positioned as the gold standard alternative to liver biopsy for MASLD/MASH diagnosis and monitoring

Target audience

Healthcare providers, clinicians, and patients with suspected or confirmed liver disease, particularly those with MASLD/MASH and chronic liver disease

Use cases

Noninvasive liver disease assessment, MASLD/MASH diagnosis and monitoring, treatment response tracking, cardiovascular risk assessment related to liver health

Company information

Company size

Small-Medium Enterprise (50-200 employees)

Revenue

$10-50 million annually

Scale

Global, primarily focused on healthcare markets in US, Europe, and Asia-Pacific

Number of users

Thousands of healthcare providers globally across 40+ countries

Features

5-minute acquisition time, Alternative to liver biopsy, Automated DICOM data transfer, Compatible with Siemens, GE and Philips MRI machines, Contrast-free scanning option, cT1 (corrected T1) biomarker measurement, Noninvasive MRI-based liver assessment, Patient-centric reporting, PDFF (Proton Density Fat Fraction) quantification, Prognostic capabilities for cardiovascular and liver outcomes, Treatment response monitoring, Works at both 1.5 and 3 Tesla

Pricing

Pricing modelsubscription
Starting price$500-1000 per scan
Billing periodAnnual or per-scan basis

Rating

4.2/5

No Trustpilot link available

Pros and cons

Based on: (AI summary)

Pros

  • Best in class accuracy for MASH detection and stratification
  • Outperforms elastography with lower failure rates, especially in high BMI patients
  • Strong correlation with biopsy features (NAS and fibrosis)
  • Prognostic value for both liver and cardiovascular outcomes
  • Cost-effective compared to biopsy and FibroScan

Cons

  • Requires MRI access and expertise
  • Higher upfront cost compared to basic blood tests
  • Limited to facilities with compatible MRI equipment
  • May have longer wait times due to MRI scheduling

Feature Comparison

Top features across 20 competitors (most common first)

Feature Continuous …Lab-on-a-Pa…LiverMultiS…Digital Hea…Apple WatchApple Watch…Wearable Fi…Continuous …Fibion Heli…Fibion Kron…Fibion SENS…Comprehensi…Digital Hea…Galaxy WatchActiGraph A…Liver Healt…Remote Pati…SimpleSense…Connected G…Osin Loop
Continuous glucose monitoring
Mobile app integration
Heart rate monitoring
Health monitoring sensors
Integration with healthcare systems
Activity tracking
Circadian rhythm tracking
Data sharing capabilities
Mobile app connectivity
Real-time alerts
Trend analysis
Antibiotic dosing insights
DNA-based biosensors
Hundreds of biomarker monitoring
Patch-based wearable
Real-time diagnostics
Sepsis monitoring
5-minute acquisition time
Alternative to liver biopsy
Automated DICOM data transfer